A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Javier Armando Pascagaza
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por improcedente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
El representante legal de la Fundación Marido y Mujer solicitó a la Corporación anular la totalidad del trámite del proceso correspondiente a los expedientes T-4167863, T-4189649, T-4309193, T-4353964, T-4259509 y T-4488250, por considerar vulnerado el derecho fundamental al debido proceso.
La Sala encuentra que no se reúnen las condiciones formales para admitir el incidente de nulidad propuesto y, en consecuencia, decide rechazarlo por IMPROCEDENTE.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR POR IMPROCEDENTE la solicitud de nulidad instaurada por Javier Armando Suárez Pascagaza, actuando en condición de representante legal de la Fundación Marido y Mujer, en el sentido de anular la totalidad del trámite del proceso correspondiente a los Expedientes: T-4.167.863; T-4.189.649; T-4.309.193; T- 4.353.964; T-4. 259.509; y T-4.488.250.
- Segundo. Contra esta decisión no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.